Re: (fwd) In reply to comments about new policy (fwd)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Jeon Young-mi: "Old vulnerability disclosure please? (fwd)"
• Previous message: Doug Siebert: "Re: full disclosure"
• In reply to: anthony baxter: "Re: (fwd) In reply to comments about new policy (fwd)"

> > The following was recently posted to comp.security.unix.  I strongly 
> > encourage everyone with a position on this to voice their opinion.  
> BUT NOT ON BUGTRAQ!!!!

Wait a minute here. BugTraq is a full disclosure list. Why wouldn't be
interested in 8lgm being full disclosure as well? The discussion doesn't
have to take place here, but the notification of the voting process
should atleast be announced.

Ciao,

-- 
Richard Bainter          Mundanely     |    System Analyst        - OMG/CSD
Pug                      Generally     |    Applied Research Labs - U.Texas
          pug@arlut.utexas.edu         |    pug@bga.com
Note: The views may not reflect my employers, or even my own for that matter.

• Next message: Jeon Young-mi: "Old vulnerability disclosure please? (fwd)"
• Previous message: Doug Siebert: "Re: full disclosure"
• In reply to: anthony baxter: "Re: (fwd) In reply to comments about new policy (fwd)"